On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] [ ... ] >> I did do the initial import, but am busy with other project and we're >> also a little out of date compared to their latest version. >> >> Simon. [ ... ] > If there's any documentation about what the values mean in the datasource it > would be helpful. > > The import account hasn't agreed to the CTs. Is this an oversight, or are > there legal reasons preventing it from agreeing?
Hi all, I've had a discussion with the CATMP publishers and they want us to keep the data in OSM under the new CT/ODbL. So as soon as Simon agrees for the CATMP account, that should be a good part of Alberta sorted out. :-) _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
