On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:37:17AM -0600, Tyler Gunn wrote: > With wooded areas and lakes I've noticed we tend to just leave them > un-merged. I can imagine for boundaries we'd like to have them > merged, especially considering they'd be spanning many tiles.
This begs the question: are there any reasons to merge areas like wooded areas or lakes that are broken up? Any reason NOT to merge them? -- James (Jay) Treacy [email protected] _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
