Richard,
I understand that you would prefer that this evolves differently, but lets
focus on the subject and try to progress in the right direction. This url
http://www.data.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=0D3F42BD-1 describe proposed
license for the government of Canada Open data site to be effective soon.
Following discussions with provincial governments some agree if not all to use
the same license. This is the case of the government of Quebec.
Could OSM contributors help to progress in the right direction and
comment about the license? After that we will be able to focus on
obtaining more data.
The questionI ask yout to answer : Is this proposed license compatible or not
to import data into OSM.
Pierre
>________________________________
> De : Richard Weait <[email protected]>
>À : Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>Cc : talk-ca <[email protected]>
>Envoyé le : Vendredi 15 mars 2013 7h04
>Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Licence donnees.gouv.qc.ca
>
>
>2013/3/14 Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>
>
>>
>>[ ... ] This license is said to be derived from the United Kingdom license
>>which is said to be compatible with the ODbL (and thus OSM ).
>>
>>I would appreciate your comments on this.
>
>
>All right. You asked. :-)
>
>
>The governments, municipal, provincial and federal, who choose to create or
>modify an Open Data license are hurting Open Data. The first stab wound was
>the misguided Vancouver Open Data license and we have not yet stopped the
>bleeding.
>
>Modifying an Open Data license is similar to declaring that "in my
>municipality, we will use a modification of a standard electrical appliance
>plug and socket." The plug from a Waterloo Region toaster may be incompatible
>with an socket in Quebec City in obvious or subtle ways.
>
>
>Household appliances might move periodically when an owner moves, or when an
>appliance is sent as a gift. Open Data, by definition, is intended to be
>combined and compared and moved about, further and more often than a simple
>appliance.
>
>We've been clever enough to standardize our appliance plugs across the
>continent. It is important to standardize our Open Data licenses around the
>world.
>
>
>Governments. Use the Open Data licenses drafted and curated by the Open Data
>Commons at the Open Knowledge Foundation. You (governments) do not have the
>mandate from your citizens to spend their money to learn the things that you
>need to know about international data law that are required to draft a
>rational Open Data license. To do so in each municipality and province is a
>phenomenal waste of resources. And you don't have the mandate to consume
>resources to maintain that license once you draft it. International data law
>is new and evolving. You can't keep up.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
