I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as "natural":"wood") is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and other maps.
Chris On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe <[email protected]> wrote: > I can only address point 4. I'd love to see newer Canvec data. > > *Darren Wiebe* > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello List: >> >> Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM >> format, I'm curious about: >> >> 1: I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-) >> 2: Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still >> available? >> 3: Was there ever a program written to produce a "diffs" file? >> 4: Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM? >> >> Just throwing this out there. >> >> Andrew >> aka CanvecImports >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
