Well, since we do not have received any response/insurance from NRCan that the 
ftp site will keep running, I would like to have a backup location, just in 
case the official ftp site stops to provide data. I would be very sad if the 
data eventually ends up being no longer available.

 

However, since I used to be the NRCan contact (now retired), I wish to make 
clear that my answer is from an OSM user’s point of view, not an NRCan answer 
(official or not !-)

 

Best

Daniel

 

From: Darren Wiebe [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: November-15-14 16:21
To: Daniel Begin
Cc: [email protected]; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

 

Would it be acceptable to mirror the Canvec data in the FTP site?  I'd gladly 
put up the resources to serve up the data.

 

Darren Wiebe

 

 

First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer (never 
again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no resources 
allocated to work with the OSM community.

 

Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …

-          They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they could/would 
be released to the public;

-          They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool – but you usually 
need to pay to get the appropriate licences…

 

Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …

-          There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca archives (some 
were even available for few NTS through ftp site)

-          Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know. 

 

Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of the data in 
the ftp site L

 

Best,

Daniel

 

 

From: Chris Davis [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: November-15-14 01:56
To: Darren Wiebe
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life

 

I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's 
vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as "natural":"wood") 
is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and other maps.

 

Chris

 

On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe <[email protected]> wrote:

I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data. 

 

Darren Wiebe

 

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello List:

        Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
format, I'm curious about:

1:      I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
2:      Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
available?
3:      Was there ever a program written to produce a "diffs" file?
4:      Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?

        Just throwing this out there.

        Andrew
        aka CanvecImports


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 

 

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to