Should we layer this ie one project to map the buildings, another to add addresses, the processes are quite different and at the moment its difficult to say a tile is done for buildings when the address info hasn't been added and that means mappers going over the same tiles multiple times. Are we using Mapbox imagery or Bing for this one by the way?
Thanks John On 9 May 2016 at 16:11, Kunce, Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > If we can get good pre-event imagery and do the building by building > assessment I don’t think we will need post-event imagery but I can be on > the lookout for it. > > Dale > — > Dale Kunce | Senior Geospatial Engineer and GIS Team Lead | International > Services | American Red Cross > 2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006 > > Tel 202.303.4095 | Cell 510.842.7523 | Skype dkunce > > > > > > > > On 5/9/16, 4:08 PM, "Paul Norman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 5/9/2016 12:43 PM, Kunce, Dale wrote: > >> Bernie, > >> I do see that the building footprints are in the esri basemap > >> unfortunately this doesn’t actually help. The esri basemap data is > >> just an tiled image and does not provide us with the vector data that > >> we need to complete our work. I’m happy to take the lead and > >> coordinate the mapping. The existing Bing imagery is good enough for > >> our needs for tracing. > >> > > > >Any hope of getting post-event imagery, which will allow us to avoid > >mapping buildings which no longer exist and shouldn't be in OSM? > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Talk-ca mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
