On 2016-06-28 04:19 PM, Nathan Wessel wrote: > It seems like conditional restrictions may be what we need. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Conditional_restrictions > > But it looks like we would be forging new ground if we went that > direction. I don't see anything on that page about signals of any kind. > (yet!)
OSRM seems to be programmatically narrow in its insistence on only scanning the 'no_' part of the restriction. These are useful and clear tags. Fix OSRM, not the map. Relations are already complex enough that many mappers avoid them. Coming from a country where the whole idea of turning on red is illegal (and all pedestrian crossings are scramble crossings, as they should be) I wonder if this is just a black swan to the developers? cheers, Stewart _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
