+1
J'invite les autres contributeurs canadiens à indiquer leur accord avec le
message de Daniel. :)
I invite other canadian OSM contributors to express their agreement with Daniel
message. :)
Pierre
De : Begin Daniel <[email protected]>
À : James <[email protected]>; Adam Martin <[email protected]>
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <[email protected]>
Envoyé le : mardi 30 août 2016 17h35
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada
#yiv2492822147 #yiv2492822147 -- _filtered #yiv2492822147
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv2492822147
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv2492822147
#yiv2492822147 p.yiv2492822147MsoNormal, #yiv2492822147
li.yiv2492822147MsoNormal, #yiv2492822147 div.yiv2492822147MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv2492822147 a:link,
#yiv2492822147 span.yiv2492822147MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2492822147 a:visited, #yiv2492822147
span.yiv2492822147MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2492822147
span.yiv2492822147EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv2492822147
.yiv2492822147MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv2492822147 {margin:1.0in 1.0in
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv2492822147 div.yiv2492822147WordSection1 {}#yiv2492822147 I
have contacted the user that is about/has deleted some changesets imported from
Canvec. I may agree on some of his comments but totally disagree on the method
he is using to make his point. I do not know what the DWG will do about
this guy but here is the message I sent him... Bonjour Nakaner, I understand
that you wish the data in OSM being accurate, well-structured and made
according to the rules developed by the OSM community. However, I would
strongly suggest that you discuss your point with the Canadian community before
deleting any changesets. Canvec imports are running for more than 6 years
and the structure of the data was discussed with the Canadian OSM community,
including OSMF members, for more than a year. The result is a compromise that
used to suit most members. The rules you are mentioning in the comments you
leave where not even written at that time. Most Canadian importers simply
keep doing what they used to do years ago. If you consider they should not,
have a discussion with the whole Canadian community. You will then be able to
make your point, make everyone aware of these rules and understand your
concerns. You will then be able to build a stronger community, not
discourage people to contribute because they have made errors... Daniel
From: James [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August, 2016 09:18
To: Adam Martin
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada He's even going to
revert my work:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41776742 I've forwarded this to the DWG,
it's getting rediculous. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Adam Martin
<[email protected]> wrote: That's a pretty harsh thing to deal with.
Imports are difficult and the time needed to get them right is not a small
investment. To have someone review this work is a valuable service, but I don't
think just blanket reverting due to the violation of one rule is the solution,
especially in context of the lack of data in some of those areas. The CANVEC
stuff will do until surveys or satellite data catches up with those areas.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, John Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
Andrew, I hear you! I have been trying to add data around unmapped Northern
Communities around James Bay and Nunavut. But after someone revert some of my
work I'm stopping:( John
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
