Yes the new canvec are split into different types of data: hydro data(lakes
rivers etc), forest(loads of fun),  transportation(this is what you want),
etc

On Sep 12, 2016 4:08 PM, "Martijn van Exel" <m...@rtijn.org> wrote:

> Aren't these files grouped by feature type? So if we look at roads we
> wouldn't also necessarily need to look at land use boundaries etc.? At
> least that's what I am getting looking at http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/
> en/nrcan-rncan/ess-sst/23387971-b6d3-4ded-a40b-c8e832b4ea08.html
>
> --
>   Martijn van Exel
>   m...@rtijn.org
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016, at 12:59, James wrote:
>
> Plus it would help identify which parts and canvec are actually needed vs
> importing a bunch of forests and hoping for some roads
>
> On Sep 11, 2016 2:48 PM, "John Marshall" <rps...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Great idea Martijn,
>
> One of the big problems of OSM in Canada is there are many missing road
> where there are no local mappers. Canada is very big. Any tools to help map
> unmapped area of Canada gets a big +1 from me.
>
> John
>
> John Marshall
>
> On Sep 9, 2016 17:36, "Martijn van Exel" <m...@rtijn.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A few colleagues at Telenav and myself are looking at Canvec 2016. Roads
> specifically. I am sure some of you already have done that. Something we
> are looking into a workflow that is something like this (simplified):
>
> Canvec 2016 Shapefiles --> Conflation engine (Cygnus [1]) --> Tasking
> manager
>
> The output of the conflation would be an OSM XML change file that could
> be (selectively) applied in JOSM. It would contain new / changed ways as
> well as some new or changed tags. All proposed updates would be verified
> manually (through tasking manager.)
>
> What do you think about this idea?
>
> The conflation engine takes OSM PBF as input, so the Canvec shapefiles
> would need to be translated (using ogr2osm). That would require an
> ogr2osm translation file. I wonder if someone already did this? (I am
> using this [2] attribute list as reference.)
>
> [1]https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/37808
> [2]http://ftp.geogratis.gc.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/vector/canvec/
> doc/CanVec_Catalogue_50K_Transport/SRDB_EXPL_ESSIM_50K_Trans
> port-sd-en.html#div-1330009
> --
> Martijn van Exel
> m...@rtijn.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to