CSDs are suppose to represent city/town limits (observable as usually there's a sign that says Welcome to X or Sorry to see you leave X), but they have been rounded off to look nice and may not reflect what it is in reality
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Stewart C. Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2017-03-07 10:36 AM, Bjenk Ellefsen wrote: > > > > … Any more thoughts? > > If you're planning to import/add abstract statistical boundaries, rather > than those defined by municipal boundaries, then I'd suggest that they > don't belong in OSM. > > “Contributions to OpenStreetmap should be: > 1. Truthful - means that you cannot contribute something you have > invented. > 2. Legal - means that you don't copy copyrighted data without > permission. > 3. Verifiable - means that others can go there and see for > themselves if your data is correct. > 4. Relevant - means that you have to use tags that make clear to > others how to re-use the data > > When in doubt, also consider the "on the ground rule": map the world > as it can be observed by someone physically there.” > > — How We Map <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map> > > Unless CSDs are physically observable, they are too abstract for OSM. > > Stewart > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
