Rob,

One other thing to think about while others are discussing the licensing topic:  What is the quality of the buildings?  Has that been reviewed?


 * Are they in the right place?
 * Are they the right size?
 * Are they squared off (rectangles)
 * Are they aligned to each other and the road (not slightly mis-aligned)
 * Are they current (not buildings which have been torn down or
   otherwise changed)
 * If there are attributes like "height" in your dataset, is that
   accurate?
 * etc...

I've not worked much on buildings, but probably others could add comments about what are the criteria for "good buildings".


On 2018-03-06 11:05 AM, Rob Halko wrote:

Good morning,

The Region of Durham has recently purchased Building Footprints data for the entire Region, and it is available as Open Data: http://opendata.durham.ca/datasets/building-footprints

We would like to import these to Open Street Map to engage the community and help improve the overall map. We are supporters of OSM and wish to regularly partner in improving the data.

In particular, we are hosting a mapathon on March 29, which asks for student input to add attributes to the buildings based on OSM guidelines for the Building Canada 2020 project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020#The_data_that_could_be_mapped

We have read your Import guidelines and are here to express our interest in contributing our building data. The intention is not to overwrite those buildings that the community has built, but bridge the gap to include the rest of the 200,000+ buildings in Durham (largely residential), which are missing from OSM.

Please let us know how we can contribute this valuable data on behalf of the community.

<http://www.durham.ca/>

        

*Rob Halko | Supervisor, GIS*
Regional Municipality of Durham | Corporate Services - Information Technology
905-668-4113 ext 2189 | Mobile: 289-927-7168
Corporate Values: • Ethical Leadership • Accountability • Service Excellence • Continuous Learning and Improvement • Inclusion

THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) ONLY AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER ANY RELEVANT PRIVACY LEGISLATION. No rights to any privilege have been waived. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy, taking of action in reliance on or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and delete or destroy all copies of this message.


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to