I saw it was a great job. But you're correct, I have no documentation on how they did it. Licence process, wiki ( I feel Steve already yelling at his computer)
On Nov 5, 2018 9:24 AM, "john whelan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Someone already did Regina! and that is an issue and why we need to get this lot formalised quickly before someone starts talking about imports being done without the correct license. Cheerio John On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 10:15, keith hartley <[email protected]> wrote: > Someone already did Regina! > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 9:06 AM James <[email protected] wrote: > >> Saskatchewan has Regina data. That's it. >> >> It's totally dependent on cities contributing to the open data effort >> >> On Mon., Nov. 5, 2018, 9:21 a.m. keith hartley <[email protected] >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I'd love to do more imports - I have a group here that we get together >>> to do mapping as well as know some locals. Of course we'd add a wiki to the >>> MB page to show the project ect. From what I can tell there's no stats can >>> data for manitoba or sask though! >>> Keith >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-ca mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
