Andrew,
Keep up the great work making OSM great for Canada.
On 2018-11-27 1:36 p.m., Andrew Lester wrote:
I agree. A selective import from CANVEC is fine and generally gives
good results. As long as you don't import things like forests and
buildings (which are both woefully out-of-date, broken, or outright
wrong), there usually isn't a problem. However, if someone just
imports an entire block of data without inspecting it, that's when
we run into the visible issues that the peanut gallery picks apart.
Andrew
Victoria, BC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"James" <[email protected]>
*To: *"Andrew" <[email protected]>
*Cc: *"talk-ca" <[email protected]>
*Sent: *Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:58:19 AM
*Subject: *Re: [Talk-ca] canvec imports
not sure why Canvec always gets shat uppon, their water features are
great and pretty accurate, the forest/landcover on the other hand
needs fixing before import. I think it's clear enough on the canvec
wiki page that only experienced mappers/importers should attempt a
canvec import.
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
