Seriously Danny?
Pierre was the first to suggest the DWG after you replied to him that
wouldn't engage in further discussion. You only joined this conversation
after I reported you.
There is a massive difference between making edits without review and
importing millions of buildings without review.
Nate Wessel
Jack of all trades, Master of Geography, PhD candidate in Urban Planning
NateWessel.com <http://natewessel.com>
On 3/15/19 11:23 AM, Danny McDonald wrote:
By the way, I strongly object to the way Nate immediately went to the
DWG, instead of attempting to engage in discussion.
I think many people on this list fundamentally misunderstand the way
OSM operates. Most OSM contributions are made by individuals who see
a gap/mistake in the data and fix it. It is not a "community process"
where contributions are made by a group of "local mappers" (although
this sometimes happens).
The great strength of OSM (relative to Google Maps), is that you can
make edits immediately without going through a peer review process.
Some people on this list seem to want to impose a peer review process
on OSM (at least for imports, for now), because they think they know
better, and should be given power because of it.
DannyMcD
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
