On Samstag, 7. April 2012, MZ wrote: Hi all,
> It is true.. The road are in wrong classification. There seems to be 2 diffenrent classification methods out there: I found this post about classification, http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/11623/urban-highwayroad- classification/11640 which mentions, that the > classification is done by 'importance', not necessarily by physical > attributs like the surface or width. This is validated by this voting process (more or less): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Highway_key_voting_importance http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence > In undeveloped areas (Labrador, the three Territories, northern > Ontario and Québec): Classifications are moved up so that the most > important roads in the area are marked primary even if they do not > meet the usual criteria. This ist marked as "Alternate Proposal only." Cuba seems to be tagged according to an alternate proposal as well. But http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways says: > The value of the highway tag should be applied without regard to > network and route systems. Which i understand as: don't use those alternate proposals. > Can you made a doc file with the your new classifications? After reading that voting thing above, i'd leave most of the roads as they are and only de-classify those that i know about. openstreetbugs were the place to document wrong taggings. Rgds, Jens _______________________________________________ Talk-cu mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cu
