I would completely remove the name, not move it to a the description. There is a correct operator set, and the name or description doesn't really add anything new. Additionally - this seems to be the typical "new user and iD" goof, where the new mapper is adding the operator, but iD implies it needs the name by putting it prominently up. Just look at the history where it was added.
25. května 2019 9:55:07 SELČ, "Michal Fabík" <michal.fa...@gmail.com> napsal: > a) >anything and everything can/should have a name, and b) names and >descriptions _______________________________________________ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
