Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by [email protected]: > I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am > satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you. > Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)
> the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving > - > > https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html > which part seems to not be correct? note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import) rather than false positives > I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for > viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) > or script output that logs the changes being made would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( locations of nodes were not changed by bot, nodes were not created, nodes were not added nor removed from ways, relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc) > You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :) > This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :) > I am happy you've included a QA section > > Martin > >
_______________________________________________ talk-cz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
