though note "And make future edits based on new matches, once they will be found" part - this is obviously harder to predict as for example depends on where new shops will be mapped (including some not yet existing!)
and may also depend on improvements in my matching code which may become able to handle some POIs not edited before Dec 28, 2025, 19:28 by [email protected]: > Thanks a lot, looks good. I think it would be good to have this kind of log > for any kind of automated edit. > > Thanks again Mateusz for what you do. > > > Sent with > Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home>> secure email. > > On Wednesday, December 24th, 2025 at 4:40 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via talk-cz > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> https://pastebin.com/axchy8yw>> should have listing you requested >> >> if any other data is needed - feel free to ask! >> >> >> Dec 11, 2025, 12:29 by [email protected]: >> >>> Sorry, regarding the report, I misunderstood, it shows only missing, not >>> all matched which I was expecting. I think all the numbers you§d put on a >>> Venn diagram would be useful to show. >>> >>> Yes, just plaintext. Something that could be checked or grepped without >>> having to open up each node an a map, eg. n123456: +website:asdfg >>> +opening_hours:12-34. >>> >>> I don't know if codeberg has runners but it would be could to have the >>> script run as "action" and output log there and automatically saved and >>> accessible. Just an idea - don't want to push you into some workflow that >>> may not be practical in reality. >>> >>> >>> Sent with >>> Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home>>>> secure email. >>> >>> On Thursday, December 11th, 2025 at 12:03 AM, Mateusz Konieczny >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by [email protected]: >>>> >>>>> I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I >>>>> am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you. >>>>> >>>> Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive >>>> so far :) >>>> >>>>> the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit >>>>> deceiving - >>>>> >>>>> https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html >>>>> >>>> which part seems to not be correct? >>>> >>>> note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions >>>> or import) >>>> rather than false positives >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made >>>>> for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) >>>>> or script output that logs the changes being made >>>> would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( >>>> locations of nodes were not changed by bot, >>>> nodes were not created, >>>> nodes were not added nor removed from ways, >>>> relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc) >>>> >>>> >>>>> You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :) >>>>> >>>> This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :) >>>> >>>>> I am happy you've included a QA section >>>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
_______________________________________________ talk-cz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
