On 14/mag/2013, at 06:42, Wolfgang Hinsch <[email protected]> wrote: > Ich halte es für sinnvoll, die Nutzung der Gebäude im building-tag > unterzubringen bitte nicht die Bedeutung von building umdefinieren, die Nutzung ergibt sich aus anderen tags (wobei der Typ sich schon nach der geplanten Nutzung richtet, d.h. es gibt einen Zusammenhang). Gruß Martin _______________________________________________ Talk-de mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
- [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=residential Martin Czarkowski
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=residenti... Wolfgang Hinsch
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=resid... tumsi
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=r... Simeon
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. buildi... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. b... Alexander Lehner
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=resid... Ronnie Soak
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=r... Rainer Knaepper
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. buildi... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. buildi... Ronnie Soak
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=resid... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=r... Jimmy_K
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. buildi... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. building=r... RainerU
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. buildi... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes vs. b... René Kirchhoff
- Re: [Talk-de] building=yes v... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Talk-de] building=y... RainerU
