On Jan 31, 2008 4:03 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 31 Jan 2008, at 16:02, Dave Stubbs wrote: > > > I was aiming more for a map of what's really there, rather than a map > > of what's not there. > > The tracing people haven't actually managed to do everywhere yet, so I > > thought it gave a slightly better impression. > > There's also the false positives, ie: residential streets that > > actually don't have a name... in a highlight mode these become more > > obvious than you really want them. In dehighlight mode they just > > vanish, and you don't notice. > > > > I did try all residential streets with no name bright pink, but it was > > kind of scary. > > But there's no reason I can't do that too... I'll play with some > > style sheets. > > Cheers - so my aim would be to clear all the unnamed roads near me, > which somehting like I describe would be super helpful > >
Not so pretty, but probably does what you want: http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/progress/?region=london-highlightnoname _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
