Almost there... possible to tone down the other stuff more? On 31 Jan 2008, at 18:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 4:03 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 31 Jan 2008, at 16:02, Dave Stubbs wrote: >> >>> I was aiming more for a map of what's really there, rather than a >>> map >>> of what's not there. >>> The tracing people haven't actually managed to do everywhere yet, >>> so I >>> thought it gave a slightly better impression. >>> There's also the false positives, ie: residential streets that >>> actually don't have a name... in a highlight mode these become more >>> obvious than you really want them. In dehighlight mode they just >>> vanish, and you don't notice. >>> >>> I did try all residential streets with no name bright pink, but it >>> was >>> kind of scary. >>> But there's no reason I can't do that too... I'll play with some >>> style sheets. >> >> Cheers - so my aim would be to clear all the unnamed roads near me, >> which somehting like I describe would be super helpful >> >> > > Not so pretty, but probably does what you want: > http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/progress/?region=london-highlightnoname > have fun, SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.asklater.com/steve/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
