Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. SteveC has also suggested a London party that focuses on address data but I think we need to do a bit of work on the format and methods for that before we blindly go and make arses of ourselves.
I'll review the ideas over the weekend and suggest some more concrete proposals by Monday. Cheers Andy >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-gb- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Chadwick (email lists) >Sent: 27 November 2008 4:32 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping parties - Dec/Jan/Feb > >> As a result I thought I would open the debate up to the list to see if we >> can indeed get enough interest for Plymouth or whether others have better >> suggestions, and more importantly think we can get a decent show of >> participants. > >Cheadle, maybe. Still quite a bit of dodgy-looking data in there. Anyone >know the extent of the original damage? > >Otherwise +1 for Reading, as others have suggested. Plymouth's a bit far >for me, but doable. Jan/Feb better for me ATM. > >-- >Andrew Chadwick > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-GB mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1815 - Release Date: 27/11/2008 >9:02 AM _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
