On 9 Mar 2009, at 12:12, David Earl wrote:

> On 09/03/2009 12:04, Peter Miller wrote:
>> We are planning to give the UK administrative wiki pages a bit of  
>> a  spring clean which are all a bit random, not very well linked  
>> and  contain quite a lot of duplicated content and some very out-of- 
>> date  content.
>
> Quite a lot of the Cambs/West Suffolk stuff is organised by District  
> at the moment (though I perhaps mistakenly conflated Cambridge and  
> South Cambridgeshire, and e.g. the East Cambs page is actually named  
> Ely).
>
> District is a bit more manageable a unit than County I think.
>
> I like the idea of a coherent organisation by County, but an extra  
> level may well help IMO, for very active areas like the east of  
> England.

I fully agree that most of the detail will be at the district level  
and I did do a bunch of work sorting Cambs into a hierarchy like that  
some time ago. I think the district structure for Cambs should be good  
now.

All we are proposing at present is to sort out the UK page, create  
both England and Wales pages and then complete the English and  Welsh  
county pages - any more than that would be taking too long.

It does make sense to then build on this with districts/boroughs for  
the detail however we will be leaving that to the locals to sort out!


Regards,


Peter



>
>
> David


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to