Richard Mann wrote: > I'm aware that there's a school of thought that says there should be a lot > fewer highway tags, with further details in other tags. Can we not rehearse > that debate (please). > > I'm assuming the lower change option of keeping the diversity of tags (and > suggesting the addition of a new one between cycleway and footway) precisely > because renderers typically use this diversity. There is a definite > difference between a 2m wide path and a 4m wide path, and I think this is a > distinction that could sensibly be made.
There's a definite difference between the two paths, but nothing says that a cycle&footway will be 4m wide, nor that a cycleway or footway will not be 4m wide. Especially around the world, there is no consistency in this regard. -Alex Mauer "hawke"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
