Tom Hughes wrote: >Sent: 18 May 2009 10:34 AM >To: Ed Loach >Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] MK mapping party > >Ed Loach wrote: >>> I did 29 and I think Ollie was doing 28 yesterday, unless he >>> changed his >>> mind about what to do? >> >> I just had a quick look and Potlatch doesn't show any GPS traces for >> their area in 28 yet. I did notice you've drawn a way nearby in 29 >> with no tags (I'd guess highway=service?): >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34623821 > >Yep, that should be service. I've fixed it now. > >I also think we need to decide where tertiary should be used, as there's >quite a difference between different blocks at the moment - most don't >have any but some have loads. > >My personal opinion was that we should use tertiary for any grid roads >that aren't primary/secondary and not use it at all within the blocks in >general - just use unclassified for the more major roads in the blocks.
+1, I was going to raise this today too. Cheers Andy > >What do other people think? > >Tom > >-- >Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) >http://www.compton.nu/ > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-GB mailing list >Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb