On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:16 AM, David Earl <da...@frankieandshadow.com>wrote:
> For the record: I agree with Peter that we need to undo this user's > changes, however it is done, and that it could cause large parts of East > Anglia to be wiped out if data that happened to have his name on were to > be removed because of the license process. We need a way to deal with this. > You're exaggerating in this case. But if you're going down that road then liam123 is the least of your worries. Anyway, that's a legal question for a license switch, and the moment he (or anybody else for that matter) touches a node/way/relation it doesn't matter how we revert, we'll still have the problem. The bonus of exact reverts is that they should be pretty easy to detect and discard, but radical changes moved roughly back might not be that hard. > He keeps coming back, day after day, making nonsense edits, but not in a > random way. It's not just scribbling. > > Frederick put the revert scripts in svn a while back if you want to take a look. Dave
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
