-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:00:25 +0100 (BST) Steve Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there is a user who (by general consensus) is making nonsense > edits and is continuing to do so after having been taken to task by > email, I would have thought the first thing to do is to ban the user > from making edits before considering what to do about the edits they > have already made. Bonus points for being able to display a message > explaining *why* they've been banned when they next try to edit > stuff, with details of who to contact to resolve the situation. > That's the most sense anybody has spoken on this so far! Clearly the user needs banning from making edits until we decide whether or not to revert all the edits. I have heard nobody suggest that this user's edits are not nonsense, so why are we still arguing over what to do about this?! - -- Alice -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKZYTUAAoJEK/Rrn18ahlCdAQP/3rKpFE1OmMRi4V5AwwI3ILl wiQFH5NpdwNB1+6Jq7qxbc7r+BxPg5O81PbAeM1wRV1Ay4ZDcIDLUX3+psU/6GPm 7JaoyK99sjBcB6VmJTVXYBmMzMMH2drCOpkRsW2/uu5EusbF12SbqboSxmBhroH0 Bqj5unwf0S6u+KzuY7DBeW/xbnKMaYO+1lvrgQDRgRKR1vdefozhQLO8dkd3dXmL WwAVRB5p3GgpJgKQbvqVU1Y2nntT8q+mTu4fcGt+92WXKY713VDz0zUqV3AAwV8z LZLOAst5Dj3YwzcpMyJ9IDU97i2nqt6Zm7u5JmwbB4G/xMSxbvJ9lkx/DVrrpECd hcnt2TDNqLgPls3ykDu9pns/SIhq7ZtBggCQM8pzobWUUEUzPs9Lz3YAGlYtNox0 pt5plPgSfL1U5ctDshFdfHeWV40vNb4jBs/e5B40kxWKM7xfLhpaet1DzABccOLz bCywwaEvkYypuDiyqijIUQDFk3Mocatj0fDjo2gHymIPhgFJWqU7GgiFC5uCWPFB F4bUxUVJ70JzITsYvLuZbQ/BaCDvYmJtdFEBGu4wFVZnBWeul8KohZsK+a9IpwTt i1H62610B5VzkMV9vPDQHmXA5rVyz+xgYhhBs6LKlAQ6wAzHh/5U2x0egs4BMiPV GU65gJLIC+P7YSr4nHXF =uzdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
