I think it's worth putting the source tag on future imports. I came across this when I wanted to add ";yahoo" as opposed to ";survey". I placed the original nodes so I'm mainly deleting those and moving the naptans back into the same position.
Thanks for your work on this. Any chance of keeping a running count of how many nodes still have the unreviewed tag on them (on the wiki page)? It would provide an incentive for people to join the clean-up and a measure of progress. Oliver On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Wood <[email protected]>wrote: > 2009/8/18 Oliver Lewis <[email protected]>: > > The stops I've been looking at (for example > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/469765171/history) don't > include a > > "source=source=naptan_import" tag as suggested by the wiki > > ( > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data > ). > > I assume I'm OK to reposition them using aerial photography? > > > > Oliver > > > > I had intended to reintroduce the source tag on features before > running the import, but it slipped my mind. > It's not a very serious problem since it still is on the original > changeset. > Go ahead and realign to aerial imagery, though a GPS survey (or > merging with an existing OSM bus stop node, if assumed to be > accurately placed) is preferred, of course! > > -- > Regards, > Thomas Wood > (Edgemaster) >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
