Nick Black wrote: > So far as the structure goes, I had thought that one GB org could work, > if it had a series of user groups associated with it. The GB Chapter > could handle GB issues, raising funds to help support national and user > group activities, perhaps running a GB website, lobbying the UK > government to release data (!), and generally promoting OSM throughout > the GB area. The user groups would be focussed on a more local area (eg > Greater London) and would be affiliated (loosely or more closely) to the > GB Chapater.
All those activities are ones we want to see, but is there anything about them that requires a separate legal entity to OSMF? I'm worried that we'd be creating extra bureaucracy unnecessarily. Can you explain the specific benefits of having both OSMF and OSMF-GB? -- Jonathan (Jonobennett) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
