Hi James, I added that a while back when I first started using OSM, there were a few considerations I had then which I now realise aren't the 'OSM way'.
I wanted to map the whole route of the canal which, as you are probably aware, is being restored, As the canal has been disused for 100 years, it's mostly tagged as 'Derelict' which does render appropriately. In some places it's very difficult to see, but the signs are there if you know what to look for, For example, leaving Abingdon to the west is a short derelict section next to a track that only the initiated would realise is an old canal and not a road-side ditch, in other places you can tell the route because the crops lying over are slightly different.. (The clay canal bed although buried, traps water and affects the overlying vegetation compared to the surroundings) As there are few instances of tags for "abandoned canal in the process of being restored" and if there were they usually don't render. I chose the "disused=yes,tunnel =yes" for the rendering, rather than the actuality, as there are few tags for canals that rendered at all. Now I have a bit more experience with tagging, I realise I shouldn't have tagged for the renderer, but for what is actually there. I'll go through that stretch of the canal and tag it more appropriately, removing the parts that are only proposed, and putting more appropriate tags on the bits that are visible. Mario James Davis wrote: > There's a feature in my local area and I'm not sure it should be > included - it's the proposed new cut of the Wilts & Berks Canal, so that > it can join the Thames at a new junction rather than the original > junction which has been developed over. > > Whilst the actual junction has been completed, as far as I'm able to > tell the new route is very much 'proposed' and subject to planning, and > no firm route or timescale have been agreed on. I'm not sure that this > makes the sort of feature that should be included yet. Are there any > guidelines on features this early in their construction? > > (.. and I'm ignoring for now that the proposed cut is confusingly tagged > tunnel=yes,disused=yes). > > James > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
