WessexMario wrote: > I'll go through that stretch of the canal and tag it more appropriately, > removing the parts that are only proposed, and putting more appropriate > tags on the bits that are visible.
Thank you :) I think it's fine to have the remaining and disused parts of the canal indicated, but probably a little too much to have proposed and not yet confirmed cuts included. The whole area around the Jubilee junction is confusing enough to map as it is, quarrying has resulted in lakes, paths and tracks that I've never seen present on any other map. James _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
