On 1 April 2010 09:25, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gregory wrote: > > Without restrictions? Does that mean no attribution, it sounds like PD. > > Or does it mean they haven't told us the exact license yet but it will > > be "nice"? > > The latter, I think. http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendata/ is either > still password-protected or Slashdotted as I write (well, more likely > Guardian-ed)... a prize to the first person who can get through and find > out. ;) > > It's up and available: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/licence/docs/licence.pdf The main wrinkle seems to be this part on their requirement for attribution: "include the same acknowledgement requirement in any sub-licenses of the data that you grant, and a requirement that any further sub-licenses do the same" Can anyone comment on what that means for us, i.e. whether a simple note on the wiki as per other imports will suffice? Regards, Tom -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
