There is also the quite high level question of what is the "correct" position for these boundaries: if a boundary follows a river, and the river has changed course by a few meters since this boundary was established, does the boundary move with it, or does it stay where it was defined?
I assume that the errors that you are finding are basedo n the complex tweaking of the OS grid that was done to correct for surveying errors way back befor they had gps? Do we have a precise definition of these tweaks they made to the grid system? What are the magnatudes of these errors? JR On 19 April 2010 17:58, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/04/10 17:18, Chris Hill wrote: > >> Each boundary needs to share nodes with adjacent ones. County and >> district boundaries will also need to share nodes, so the process of >> loading them individually might be quite tedious, and would involve >> dealing with any existing boundaries. Working on improving county >> boundaries might be a good place to start. > > Ideally they also need to be done as relations and share ways with > adjacent ones. Indeed it would be good if they shared ways with any > existing features (such as rivers) where appropriate... > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://compton.nu/ > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
