On Saturday 26 June 2010, Peter Miller wrote:
> A few suggestions:
> 
> 1) Can you provide a quick link from your slippery browser to an view  
> of the same area using the main OSM browser for quick editing?
> 2) Can you provide a 'Potlach edit',  'JOSM edit' link and OSM Way  
> history link if you have a OSM feature selected?

I did these over the hack weekend and they're up now.

> 3) Can you provide experiment with matching up a way that has a  
> similar bounding box to an unmatched OS Locator bounding box where  
> there is only one candidate and the match is pretty good?
> The first two of the above will just speed up the current process, the  
> last one is possibly leading to your system suggesting names for  
> existing un-named ways in OSM which will be very handy for naming cull- 
> de-sacs.

Interesting. I wonder how good I could make the matches.

I'm not sure people should be going round mapping cul-de-sacs without noting 
names anyway though should they?

Might be fun to make a josm/(whatever) plugin that autosuggests a newly entered 
street's name.

> It would of course be a nice adjunct to functionality to   
> import OS Vector District data and stitch that into the existing OSM  
> data and one it could then even suggest a batch of changes to an area  
> but one step at a time.

Tricky because OSVD is really a rendering-oriented shapefile and not at all 
topologically correct.

> As well as respecting the not:name field you might like to also  
> consider being sensitive to the FIXME field which I use to identify  
> ways that need a ground survey to resolve the issue - possibly  
> actually we need a tag which means 'ground survey needed' so that  
> people can go out with a list of things to check in an area in one go  
> and ensure that they don't miss anything.

I could possibly show FIXMEs in the match info.

There are a bunch of things I need to do first though. Port the matching 
modules of my code to postgis, set up daily incremental auto-imports of data, 
and I also want to refactor a lot of the javascript to use the more generic 
concept of statuses rather than matches.

And I should probably also rewrite my info pages so they sound less like the 
ramblings of a lunatic.


robert.

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to