On 01/07/2010 12:37, Henry Gomersall wrote:
My take on it is that it is showing two distinct pieces of information.
...
Henry
Personally I'd try and show both as well. It's pretty common - there's
another example here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.1862&lon=-1.33962&zoom=17&layers=B000FTT
Way 28587946 corresponds to where the path signs point (and
coincidentally is also what the OS have mapped). Way 34359620 is what's
actually on the ground (in this case burnt into a crop; you can't easily
deviate from it). It's also the more sensible route given that it
actually links with more paths.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
