Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool. One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an option to rank the missing roads by their approximate length/area*, rather simply alphabetically?
Targetting the largest incorrectly named roads first seems like a good way to focus our efforts on the largest impact. I suspect most map users would forgive a map that doesn't name some obscure unsigned lane that is only 20 yards long, but would be deeply suspicious of a map that incorrectly identifies the main road through their town. (* I realise this is a flawed measurement, as it doesn't account for straight vs curvy roads, but it would probably be good enough.) Cheers, GrahamS On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:42 +0000, "Peter Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of the county. To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS Locator need to be in OSM and there are 17 districts which achieve that today. We also have 88 districts with less that 50% coverage which need a little TLC and the rest are in-between. Check out our announcement here and give it a whirl! [1]http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2011/01/openstreetmap-gb-progr ess-report.html Regards, Peter Miller ITO World Ltd _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb References 1. http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2011/01/openstreetmap-gb-progress-report.html
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
