On 12 April 2011 12:30, Chris Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/04/11 09:38, Peter Miller wrote: > >> >> The general conclusion of the discussion above was that where >> maxspeed=60mph is applied to a single carriageway road there is also a >> default 'maxspeed:type=GB:unrestricted' (or whatever value is decided on). >> This default (and the one for 70mph for motorways and dual-carriageways) was >> including to avoid burdening the mapper with another tag to add in most >> situations. The only 60 mph signs that need another tag are those rare cases >> where a single carriageway road does have a numeric speed limit. >> > You must have been reading a different list to me. > > A couple of exchanged discussions about your proposal does *not* constitute > agreement to me. > > I wonder exactly what is the motivation for your juggernaut-like progress > to adopt your flawed proposal? >
Thank you for your carefully considered response ;) Are we anywhere nearer getting an agreed set of supporting 'metatags' for speed limits, regardless of where they are put (either in maxspeed or in maxspeed:sign)? Are people happy with: GB:motorway (which implies 70 mph at present and possibly 80 mph in the future) GB:dual_carriageway (which implies 70 mph at present) GB:single_carriageway (which implies 60 mph at present) If so then I will add these to the 'national' tags that I have touched. If not then can someone else lead the process of bringing this to a shared understanding? I am going to take much more of a back-seat until we get an agreement on this matter. Regards, Peter > > -- > Cheers, Chris > user: chillly > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
