On 18/05/2011 17:33, Ed Avis wrote:
Craig Wallace<craigw84@...> writes:
There is a proposed unsigned=yes tag on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Noname
But that is not very helpful, as it doesn't specify whether it is the
ref or the name (or something else) that is unsigned. Something like
unsigned:name=yes or unsigned:ref=yes would be better.
I think this is a good idea, with plain unsigned=yes taken to mean that neither
the name nor the ref or any other unique identification is signed.
But sooner or later someone will tag something as unsigned=no. Double
negatives seem faintly ridiculous to me. Why not replace unsigned=yes
with signed=no? Seems more logical to me.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
