Peter Miller <peter.miller@...> writes: >>>I have not used commercial mapping while creating the map, but some >>>errors in Navteq, TeleAtlas and AA naming locally have subsequently >>>come to my attention subsequently and I see no reason why these should >>>not be in also included in not:name.
>>That makes it harder to argue independent creation if for any reason >>our map starts to closely resemble Navteq's and they allege copying. > >I hear your concern. >You will notice that I hadn't added that information and am not >rushing to do us. OK. I may have made the common mistake of confusing the discussion of an action on the mailing list with the performance of that action. Can we agree, then, that it's a bad idea to tag anything in OSM that comes directly from proprietary maps such as Navteq - even if minor things like notes of errors in the other map - and so for any check of OS Locator versus OSM, we don't need to worry about not:name tags that might have been added for Navteq, because there won't be any. Thanks again (to you and your employees) for your work on these comparisons. -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
