On 14 June 2011 10:26, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote: > Potlatch 2's improved (not deployed yet) shapefile background layers asks > you for the projection before loading, rather than relying on the .prj file.
Thanks for clarifying. I'm not very familiar with projections so a little more clarity would be useful for me. As potlatch 'understands' OSGB, is loading an OSBG shp file any more expensive than loading a WGS84 shp file? If it is, it may be worthwhile reprojecting all the files. This would also have the advantage of making the mirror useful for those of us who simply refuse to stop using JOSM, despite all the awesome you keep piling into potlatch. Craig _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
