On 25/03/2012 11:40, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whitelegg<[email protected]> wrote:
Incidentally, is just "knowing the footpaths" evidence enough to tag with
"odbl=clean"? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with "iffy"
sources?
While we're on this topic, could I urge all of those working on Andy Street's area
to remap all constituent nodes of a way, rather than just the way itself, I've
come across at least 3 users who have re-constructed ways but left Andy's nodes
intact. I'd have thought that remapping the ways but not the nodes would keep the way
"dirty".
Apologies, however, if I've misunderstood here.
Yep, a node represents specific unrelicensable location info so unless
it has been relocated in good faith by a continuing mapper, it should be
removed. At best, the way will continue to exist but with few points. At
worst, it will contain zero nodes and no longer exist.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
