On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Nick Whitelegg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Incidentally, is just "knowing the footpaths" evidence enough to tag with > "odbl=clean"? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with "iffy" > sources?
If the way was created by a declining contributor then most (if not all) of it's nodes will have been created by the same person and therfore every node will also need an odbl=clean. Because of this I find that for ways that are highlighted in red on OSM Inspector it is usually faster to delete the way and re-create it from Bing and/or GPS traces. This also applies if a way created was clean but subsequently a declining contributor has re-adjusted its route. Every moved node is now tainted and requires an odbl=clean (and/or re-creating). Incidentally I believe that the behaviour of OSM Inspector has changed a few weeks ago. Before then it didn't always show nodes that had problems if it was included in a way with problems. Hence an area that was checked with OSM Inspector a while back and declared clean ought to be re-checked for bad nodes. Nick. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
