Thanks Richard, Andy,
Couple of points to feedback:
* Good point on the cycle paths along roads. I left this section mostly
unchanged from the original wiki page, but think we can easily add in the
details you raised.
* I might be 'brave' but am not brave enough to remove the UK Classic vs
Global. As this page is also for newcomers then I feel we need to address
highway=path as they will likely already have seen it on the OSM wiki and
will be confused as to when to use it (like I was). Unless someone can show
global use of the alternative tagging scheme, I am happy to call it
just "Alternative" and drop the "global".
Planned Timeline (5 weeks total):
* Consultation on proposed page - 2 weeks
* Collecting feedback - 1 Week
* Implementing feedback - 1 week
* Second review - 1 week (unless objections)
* New UK Tagging Guidelines page goes live
Please continue to send in feedback and I will collate it. I see that
Rights of Way have come up again on the talk-gb list and like Roberts links
(http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/) so will add some of these to the wiki
page.
Regards,
Rob
On , Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
Just a couple of quick notes:
* The cycle path section is a bit misleading as it stands. The tagging
you have shown is for standalone paths (ie mapped separately from a
road); the majority of cycle paths in the UK are on the side of a road
and thus should be tagged something like
"highway=, cycleway=track, segregated=yes/no".
I've copied the relevant section onto my user page and altered it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Spark
* I would prefer to see the 'UK Classic vs Global' stuff taken out -
these are the *UK* guidelines and hence the best/commonest practice in
the UK should be given.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
