Thanks for commenting/voting on which images provided enough evidence to tag a way as a "public footpath" / "public bridleway". I am pleased to see that there was agreement on the simple cases. Others were not so clear cut and I chuckled when I saw that a "Undecided" option had been added to the voting options. :-)
Next Steps: * It has previously been suggested that a "suspected=*" tag be used for when a mapper is undecided. Unless there are objections, I will add "suspected=*" (where * is one of the 4 options - public footpath/bridleway/BOAT/RB) and a generic "suspected=row" to the wiki guidelines. This may help us to help councils find lost way before the 2026 deadline. * 2 more images! - I am interested in how far the suspected tag should go. Please see the 2 additional images (taken from the wiki) added at the bottom of the link and vote/comment as you see appropriate: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit Cheers, Rob --- >Hi All > >Thanks for all the feedback on the UK tagging guidelines page. I have >collated all these together and will start to implement changes to the page >before reporting back here. > >I would like to add a few more images to help new users identify public >rights of way. Can you please spend a couple of minutes to vote on whether >the following images provide enough evidence to support a >designation=public_footpath / public_bridleway tag: >>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit >> >><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit> > >Thanks, >RobJN
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
