> I could equally claim that information on the surface of paths is
> absolutely essential for cyclists with road bikes, and that toilet
> opening hours are absolutely essential for people with weak bladders.
> In many areas OSM is completely hopeless at accurate routing for cars,
> motorbikes, HGVs, but we don't stop people adding roads unless they've
> got every last routing detail correct.
+1
I haven't had time to write on the tag voting document, but I did notice the
for 'private' bridleway pic, I would probably tag this as a highway = service.
This probably more as tag for the render, but in IMHO there's not much
difference between a h=service and h=track,surface=asphalt,(or
tracktype=grade1). The bonus is the service is currently rendered in Mapnik and
Cyclemap etc...
Sometimes I think it would be good if OSMers had more focus on aspects that
*all* the other map providers don't do (especially OS).
As Tom notes above, it's generally impossible even using OS maps to tell if one
would like to take a road bike down a Bridleway. One doesn't really want to
have to keep accessing the OSM data directly for these bits. If A N renderer or
routers showed/considered such detail (as appropriate for eg road bike users,
pram/wheel chair pushers, wheelchair users and various use cases) then it would
be much more powerful.
Also for toilets it is nice to know if they required a fee too!
Be Seeing You - Rob.
If at first you don't succeed,
then skydiving isn't for you.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
