On 2013-04-27 21:41, ael wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:57 +0100, ael wrote:
I noticed this at Gunnislake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.528558&lon=-4.21062&zoom=18&layers=M
I do not see what the problem is, it appears to be rendering as both,
which seems to be the desirable, as it is both a boundary and a river?
Compare this perhaps to where a boundary and river separate:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.65848&lon=-4.31517&zoom=17&layers=M
Oops. Yes you are right. It just didn't look right, but I guess the
forest surrounding made it look odd...
It would look better if the river was mapped as an area. ie with ways
for waterway=riverbank.
The Tamar is mapped with riverbanks just to the south of Gunnislake, so
you could continue that upstream.
Craig
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
