On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 12:06 +0100, Will Phillips wrote: > If this data can be used I only plan to use it to supplement ground > surveys where signage is missing or ambiguous.
It's additional information to ground surveys and should independently recorded. Rights of way are distinct from path on the ground used for walking on and should be denoted as such. It's not entirely academic as there are numerous examples of land owners unilaterally illegally moving or removing footpaths that are rights of way. It's not clear from here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions that the legal distinction is sufficiently unambiguous for rights of way. "Public footpath" doesn't seem to make the distinction at all clear to me. cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
