On 6 June 2013 10:59, sk53.osm <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing which concerns me is the 'private' release of Open Data. A number > of counties have given ProW data to persistent pesterers (not meant > perjoratively) apparently under a suitable license. I'd far rather see this > published on the official websites of the Highway Authorities, not least > because then one is reasonably sure that they have checked with OSGB re. OS > data.
I'd very much prefer any data releases to be officially published so anyone can use them under the same terms, and be sure what the terms are. Unfortunately from the Council's point of view it's a lot less effort to say yes to an individual requester, than it is to worry about how they might host the data on their website and deal with keeping it up to date there. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
