On 22 August 2013 10:03, Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote: > website=xxx - which will give the details (if we could access them from the > map)
I'm not sure if I can quote the website in this case as Google may have a database copyright on it. I generally only quote websites if they are advertised on the geographic site itself. In this case, the building was strangely anonymous, other than the name and the car parking arrangements. > > The bottom line is "do we add the fine detail?" ... places like Lumley are a My feeling is that the query/rendering tools can throw away excess detail, but cannot generate detail that is not there. I think the limit has to be set by when a reasonably intelligent person cannot distinguish between two categories (which is not to say that in the grey world in which we live, many if not most things will fall close to borderlines). _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
