Maybe osm should send a periodic email to the registered address with a validation link to ensure the address is valid.
Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 23/09/2013 12:45 SomeoneElse wrote: OpenStreetmap HADW wrote: > The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually > bogus, or malicious. What they've added is mostly just untagged ways (sometimes for buildings, sometimes perhaps fences, sometimes unclear). I'd mostly therefore mostly agree with "incompetence rather than vandalism", although some drawn untagged ways don't seem to correspond to anything. They have deleted some residential roads. Previously I undeleted a number of these as they occurred, but 4 days ago messaged about this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/14759364/history and have as yet had no reply. The last time that I looked there were a number of others yet to be fixed - I was waiting for a reply or "next edit following my message" before fixing or chasing up again. Presumably if they're using JOSM there's no guarantee that they'll ever see inter-user messages, so maybe a short block might be in order? Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/14759364/history
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
